Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/648
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Laws, David Joseph | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-02-26T16:00:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-26T16:00:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10443/648 | - |
dc.description | PhD Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | An item may be said to reach a standard suitable for use if it has some prescribed attributes. Supposet hat a variable 2: measurest he standard and TE, qT. if an item has the desired attributes. The variable -T may be very expensive to measure and so, some cheaper to measure screening variables, X say, correlated to I may be used to classify items. The purpose of screen design is to determine CX, the region of X space, for which an item should be said to reach the standard. If the error probabilities of classifying an item based on X are very high it may be economical to measure IT. Chapter 2 deals with this idea in the context of a very simple two-stage set-up in which, at the first stage of the screen a univariate screening variable X is measured. Some items are sentenced as acceptable or unacceptable, and the remainder are passed on to the second stage at which T is determined. The optimal screen is found that minimises cost, where costs are given for misclassifying items and for measuring the variables. The variable T is assumed binary and the model for TIX is a probit regression model. In designing a two-stage screen, Chapter 3 considers: (a) a general stochastic structure for (1, X), (b) a general loss function set up for misclassification costs and (c) assumes no fixed form for the screen. Also in Chapter 3, we consider a scenario in which a statistical goal or constraint is imposed in addition to the decision-theoretic target of minimising expected cost. In Chapter 4 we consider a sequential screen that operates as follows. At each stage of a sequence a covariate is measured and items may be accepted as suitable, discarded or passed on to the next stage. At the final stage the performance variable T is measured. Returning to the simple one-stage screen based solely on measuring covariates, Chapter 5 poses the question of how many and which covariates to include as part of the screen. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Newcastle University | en_US |
dc.title | A Bayes decision theoretic approach to the optimal design of screens | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | School of Mathematics and Statistics |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Laws97.pdf | Thesis | 10.45 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
dspacelicence.pdf | Licence | 43.82 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.